This page is a mixture of "the truth" and my own personal opinion.
If you're tired of reading opinions on and of the Red Line, please leave now :-)
Baltimore's proposed Red Line light rail system was controversial from the very start. It
was proposed to go thru Canton when many there felt it wasn't needed. It was proposed to go
through downtown Baltimore in another tunnel, like the Metro Subway system, starting
in Canton, and facing the same challenges that the Metro did when it extended the line from
Charles Street to Hopkins.
No-one who knows me can deny that I am a big fan and supporter of Mass Transit, but there are
some ideas and plans that we should just let go of.... this is one of them. And yes,
whenever I can, I do ride Mass Transit, even busses! :-)
One reason I have a problem with the system is: What many people (read: supporters) of
the system forget, is that to attract more than just the "poor",
the system has to be integrated into the rest of the areas transit systems
so that it makes it easy for everyone to get around. One of the biggest
problems with the rail transit in Baltimore is that other than Penn and Camden
stations (with connections to regional and commuter rail), there is no connection
between the light rail and the metro system. Why is that? Why
did the MTA plan a system like that? That one decision alone has
prevented the two systems from attracting more riders, especially from
the suburbs. I'm all for "helping the poor, and the
disadvantaged", but what does this system really do for these
people? Do we really need to spend almost 3 billion, just so
the poor can brag about getting to work on a flashy new system?
The money would be better spent trying to directly help those people!
I know the U.S. is in the middle of a rail renaissance, but not every
system is needed or will produce the desired results the planners think
it will bring. Northern Virginia recently (June 2015) decided
against spending the money on a light rail system, because enough
people had the sense to realize the cost was just not worth the end
result. Hooray for them!
So here we go again, designing yet another (third) system that will
have NO commonality with either of the two existing systems.
Again, how can the MTA be so stupid in their decisions and design
choices? How are we supposed to transfer between the three
systems without getting exposed to the weather? Why don't
they design the system to use both high and low platforms, and
then use part of the Metro Subway system's tunnel? Run it
down Security Blvd instead of down the middle of the end of I-70
- putting it in the middle of the interstates might be OK in some
cities, but just like the Metro system running up I-795, it now
becomes more of a commuter rail system that is not easy to get to.
One of the Sunpaper articles below states that with the decision
to nix the Red Line, Maryland will lose $288 million from the
Feds. But has anyone considered where Maryland's portion of
the outrageous $2.9 billion in construction costs would come
from? Do we really need to pay $2.6 billion just so we can
get a measly 10% of the construction costs for free? Would
you buy a house if someone was going to give you 10% of its costs,
but you really STILL couldn't afford to buy the house? Doesn't
make sense to me either.
In a later story by Sheryll Cashin (Politico, link below), she asserts
that the cancellation of the Red Line is
keeping the city segregated and poor. What BS. The poor of
Baltimore are doing a fine job of keeping themselves poor without anyone's
help..... As I said elsewhere, providing city residents with a flashy way to
get out of the city is not going to make them any better, or do anything
other than cost them more in the long run, when now, the state will have to
tax the poor EVEN MORE to keep paying for the millions of dollars it just
cost to build, and then maintain the system, but hardly anyone thinks about
those costs to ALL taxpayers.
Many fail to view transit systems as a tax on the poor, those who can least
afford additional taxes!!!
For anyone reading this that has to do with the design of the system
if it ever comes to fruition, I have a few suggestions:
-- Build it the way DART built their light rail system in Dallas,
and have the light rail go UP N OVER a lot of their roads,
thereby eliminating the possibility of grade crossing accidents at
those locations! Another benefit would be you are not holding
up vehicular traffic. It would eventually pay for itself in
the form of less maintenance costs, sending operators for a drug
test every time they got into an accident, and paying off people
when there is an accident!
-- Who says the tracks have to be built to standard gauge --
4'-8 1/2"? If you're going to build a system that has
no connection to anything else, why not build it to, say, a six foot
gauge? The cars can be bigger to accommodate more people,
thereby increasing the the through-put and making a more stable
ride. In the late 1800's and early 1900's, private transit
companies were usually built to different gauges. There is
nothing saying that standard gauge has to be the norm.
Before the Civil War, the south had been building their railroads
to six foot gauge, think of what our trains today could carry if
we had used that instead of standard gauge! Think
outside the box peeople! There is no reason - ZERO - to
have it built to standard gauge! OK, there is one, Plasser
and the other rail maintenance companies only make their equipment
for standard gauge, if we do something non standard gauge, we
won't have any equipment to set ties or regulate our ballast :-(
Around the middle of July 2015, supporters want the Governor to
prove to them that he went over the plans FULLY in order to reach
his decision to nix the system. Have these supporters come
up with ANY alternatives on how to make the system cheaper to
build? Or is all they can do is criticize??? Anyone
can do that! Besides, he doesn't have to prove to anyone that he
read it or not!!!
In a related story, I think spending $58 mil on a Maglev study is a
complete waste of time, the money could be better spent of helping
the homeless, or building a better bus system. Who is going
to ride a line between Baltimore and Washington if it is still
easier just to drive down to DC to get where you are going?
What do we gain from a mode of transportation that saves 20 minutes
from the 30 (or less) commute between Penn Station and Union
Station? And then you are still at the mercy of another
form of transportation to get you to your final destination.
There is NO advantage other than the "WOW" factor and
the bragging rights. Again, all at the expense of the taxpayers
Will the Red Line ever get built? Maybe...... Maybe not.
But not in its current form, for the plan is just too expensive for
the potential gains we will benefit from its realization.
As of October 2016, the transit coalition is again trying to revive
interest in building the system, see the box below......
This page will highlight some of the proposals and discussions.
I love trains, and I love signals. I am not an expert. My webpages reflect what I find on the topic of the page. This is something I have fun with while
trying to help others.
Please Note: Since the main focus of my two websites is railroad signals, the railfan guides are oriented towards the signal fan being able to locate them.
For those of you into the modeling aspect of our hobby, my
indexa page has a list of almost everything railroad oriented
I can think of to provide you with at least a few pictures to help you detail your pike.
If this is a railfan page, every effort has been made to make sure that the information contained on this map and in this railfan guide is correct. Once in a while,
an error may creep in :-)
My philosophy: Pictures and maps are worth a thousand words, especially for railfanning. Text descriptions only get you so far, especially if you get lost or
disoriented. Take along good maps.... a GPS is OK to get somewhere, but maps are still better if you get lost! I belong to AAA, which allows you to get
local maps for free when you visit the local branches. ADC puts out a nice series of county maps for the Washington DC area, but their state maps do not have the
railroads on them. If you can find em, I like the National Geographic map book of the U.S..... good, clear, and concise graphics, and they do a really good job
of showing you where tourist type attractions are, although they too lack the railroads. Other notes about specific areas will show up on that page if known.
Aerial shots were taken from either Google or Bing Maps as noted. Screen captures are made
with Snagit, a Techsmith product... a great tool if you have never used it!
By the way, floobydust is a term I picked up 30-40 years ago from a National Semiconductor data book, and means miscellaneous
and/or other stuff.
Pictures and additional information is always needed if anyone feels inclined to take 'em, send 'em, and share 'em, or if you have something to add or correct.... credit
is always given! Please be NICE!!! Contact info is here
Beware: If used as a source, ANYTHING from Wikipedia must be treated as being possibly inaccurate, wrong, or not true.